-
Recent Posts
-
Categories
-
Tags
2009 accessibility advertisement advertising analytics australia Campaign controversial dark google gorilla cadbury ad group IAB ICT innovation Kate Lundy linkedin marketing metrics naked nike obama Paul Potts popular press release Senator Lundy singularity social video Standards statistics stella artois su successfull superbowl Susan Boyle tv video video SEO viral viral video vodcast whitehouse witchery wmg YouTube -
Archives
- April 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
-
Subscribe To
Most commenters on YouTube are males between 13 and 27 years
Recently, we've been asked a lot about commenters on YouTube - it seems there is a large interest in finding out more about the engaged audience in videos. Our gut feeling was always that the majority of commenters were between 15 and 25. It is actually quite amazing how many immature and little useful comments you will find on YouTube - but occasionally you will also find some discussion gems between well-informed people. So, picking the gems amongst the noise is hard. But how hard?
Today we are approaching the answer to this question with an analysis of the demography of commenters on YouTube. For this, we have randomly picked 2,120 videos from YouTube, for which we found 36,459 comments. That's an average of roughly 17 comments per video, but note that this number doesn't mean much because the random 2,120 videos include ones that have no comments as well as ones with several thousands of comments. Since YouTube doesn't actually expose more than 1,000 comments per video, we had to limit the analysis of the comments per video to 1,000.
Out of the 36,459 randomly picked comments that were analysed 21,464 were by male commenters, 9,914 by female commenters. The remaining 5,081 commenters did not expose their gender.
Gender of commenters on YouTube
Even if all the commenters that did not expose their gender were female (which is unlikely) - the clear majority of commenters are male .
Now let's look at the age distribution. Out of the 36,459 randomly picked comments 26,668 provided their age. The distribution of ages is given in the next graph.
Age distribution of commenters on YouTube
The graph provides the exact age distribution as given by the commenters. Assuming they have all been truthful, we arrive at an a verage age of commenters of 27.59 years , i.e. the majority of commenters (namely 50.4%) are below 28 years of age.
Age distribution of commenters with 50% marked
Details of the distribution are found in this table:
Age distribution of commenters
Now, you will have noticed that out of the 36,459 randomly picked comments that were analysed, interestingly 326 declared to be over the age of 100 and the graph clearly spike for over 100 year-olds. We cannot easily make decisions about whether people have provided a misleading age or not, but for those over 100 it is a fair estimate to say that are incorrect. Since they create an unfair bias in the statistics, we also provide the analysis with ages above 100 removed.
Age distribution of commenters less than 100 years old
Now the average age of comment authors has come down to 26.6 and 52.93% of commenters are less than 27, 75% less than 36 years old.
The largest number of comments has been posted by 22 year old males (6.5%). As our initial gut feeling was the most commenters on YouTube are males between 15 and 25, this analysis has confirmed the gender and roughly the age group: the majority of commenters are between 13 and 27 years old.
We have no explanation for the weird shape of the graph which has a strong dip at 18 years and an unexpected peak at 29 years. This may well just be a problem with the small data set that we used, or there may be some fact to explain this. If you have any theories for these values, please leave a comment. We intend to undertake a broader analysis over more videos and comments in the future and may even be able to test your theories.